

| Subject: | Re: Engine Performance vs Tire Size |
| From: | Sean Garrett |
| Date: | Sun, 15 Dec 2002 07:48:05 -0700 |
Larry, you might be experiencing a loss of power due to friction. More tread = more friction and the rubber may be significantly different enough to cause even more friction. Just my basic physics that I remember from static's. Sean Garrett -----Original Message----- From: Larry Chase [mailto:lchase@ATTGLOBAL.NET] Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 4:52 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Engine Performance vs Tire Size A while back my stock engine was rebuilt (stock 2.1L to a Eurocars 2.2L) After the rebuild my "Seat of the Pants" conclusion was that I had gained 10-15% in Engine performance (Acceleration & Top End MPH). Now to the topic ..... Engine Performance vs Tire Size Since then I've had the opportunity to try two different tire sizes on the same vehicle. Since I was planning on going to a large than stock tire, I anticipated sacrificing a little power / performance. But it seems to be more than a little. Tire Details: Size / Width / Diameter / Rev per Mile Original Owner Tires 27X8.5R14 / 8.6" / 26.5" / 795 ... Dunlop Rover - 10-15% Engine Power Increase (as noted above) First Replacement Tire Set 215/65R15 / 8.7" / 26.1" / 818 ... Michelin - No Change Engine Power Increase Second Replacement Tire Set ... Current Tires 215/75R15 / 8.5" / 27.7" / 755 ... Michelin LTX 0% Engine Power Increase Does it make sense that I'd loose 10-15% in performance by increasing the tire diameter 1.2"? If that's the case ..... I might consider changing to a tire closer to the OE Tire diameter. Larry
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »