

| Subject: | Re: Utilities |
| From: | John Rodgers |
| Date: | Mon, 23 Dec 2002 22:42:01 -0600 |
Was there ever a "half-camper" built. I mean something eith a pop-top but limited paraphanalia inside. The narrow bed of the full Westies are a real turn-off to me. That rear cabinet would have to go. I never have owned a Westy, but have thought a lot about it. I have done a lot of travel camping in my GL. I've gotten by so far, but having a pop top would really be nice. I'm just wondering what various combinations were manufactured. John Rodgers 88 GL Driver Chuck Hill wrote: >Miguel wrote: > >I would like to know if those who have stove and sink in their Vanagons >really use them and feel the need of having one. >----------------------- >This should raise some serious debate. I've had both versions of the >Westy camper, with frig, stove, etc., and without. There are times when >one or the other is preferable. In the end, my wife & I like the >"without utilities" version better overall. Our very first Westy was a >GL with the whole set of stuff, and we loved it, and had it for about 6 >or 7 years. That was actually when the kids were small, and the seating >room was needed. Now our "best" Westy is a non-GL, without the >"utilities", and it's what we like. I'm in the process of restoring an >'82 Westy, and it will have the full width rear folding seat, no >cabinets, the side table from a Carat, and a couple of removable jump >seats. It weighs just 3100 lbs this way, and accellerates surprisingly >well, having shed quite a lot of weight. > >Another topic: How fast do those of you in Europe, especially in >Germany, drive on the Autobahn or similar roads? We visited again in >March of this year, and I was impressed with the speeds on the road. I >wondered at what speed a T3 Vanagon would safely cruise. > >Chuck Hill > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »