

| Subject: | Re: cell phones (was:FGA) |
| From: | Bill N |
| Date: | Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:28:19 -0700 |
This must vary from place to place. I live in a very sparsely populated area in SE Arizona. The town I am near is 2500 people, and it is a 45 minute drive to a town with about 10,000 people (and a Walmart!!). On that drive you don't pass any buildings. My work takes me all over Cochise County, since I work with many ranchers, and I get into some very remote areas. In addition, the whole area is mountainous, with elevations ranging from 3500' to over 9000'. I have used a cell phone for 8 years, and except for extremely rare cases when I manage to get into the bottom of a deep canyon, I never have a problem. I find my phone to be very reliable. Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Brodbeck" <gull@CYBERSPACE.ORG> > > At 02:37 AM 1/17/2003, zampano wrote: > > > How come cell phones still are horribly > > >unreliable all over the U.S?? When I could use them in Italy, > > >Switzerland and Germany 8 years ago on mountain peaks, valleys, subway > > >stations, anywhere except tunnels??? > > > > Have you compared the sizes? Germany for example, has a helicopter/trauma > > center setup that can get people to a trauma center from anywhere in the > > country in fifteen minutes. This is great, but they have only about > > one-eighth the land mass per inhabitant (230/km^2 vs 27/km^2 ten or fifteen > > years ago) > > That's part of it, but another major difference is that Europe > standardized on one digital cell phone standard. In the U.S., there > wasn't the political will to do this, so we have three completely > incompatible phone networks. For everyone to get reliable service the > whole country has to be covered in triplicate! This is one case where a > little more government intervention would have benefited everyone.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »