If I'm not mistaken, this happened outside a football stadium.  The car
was moved-  it's worth a fortune because it's the only car that was hit
by a meteor.  You can see from the picture that it was taken through
protective glass.  No doubt it on display somewhere in a museum of
sorts.  You can see a reflection of the people gazing at it in the
protective glass.

Certainly not a hoax.  Well documented.  Coincidentally, the pictures
shown in the link given on that page were taken just about 40 miles
south of where I live.

Brad

David Brodbeck wrote:

>On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, developtrust wrote:
>
>
>
>>I just still do not believe a meteor will slow down enough to cause such
>>minor damage. It has to be a hoax.
>>
>>
>
>I don't think the damage is actually all that 'minor'.  A lot of energy
>was dissipated in deforming and puncturing all that sheet metal.  If you
>look closely, the *whole car* is deformed -- notice the uneven gaps at the
>tops of the doors. The photo appears to have been taken inside a garage;
>that suggets that either the photo was staged after the car had been moved
>(which would explain the lack of an impact crater) or the meteor was
>slowed somewhat by punching through the roof before hitting the car.
>Either way, it would have lost a lot of momentum in the process of
>crumpling the unlucky Chevy.
>
>There's also this page, which goes into great detail about the meteor,
>including the fact that it was videotaped during its descent by no fewer
>than 16 people: http://uregina.ca/~astro/mb_5.html   A Google search will
>turn up several more references.  I don't think it's a hoax.
>
>             _ _
>  __ _ _   _| | |  | David M. Brodbeck (N8SRE)              Ypsilanti, MI
> / _` | | | | | |  +-----------------------------------------------------
>| (_| | |_| | | | @ cyberspace.org
> \__, |\__,_|_|_| "To the optimist, the glass is half full.  To the
> |___/             pessimist, the glass is half empty.  To the engineer,
>                   the glass is twice as big as it needs to be."
>
>
>