

| Subject: | Re: CV article now available - I'm confused (long) |
| From: | Ben McCafferty |
| Date: | Mon, 27 Jan 2003 12:39:48 -0700 |
Hey Tom, I like the tube/wire idea. I've wanted a better way to explain this for some time now, and that really gets the point across. And Mark D., you're welcome for bringing this up again. I know how you love it so.... :) tx, bmc :) Ben McCafferty ben@volkscafe.com Volks Cafe 1823 Soquel Avenue Santa Cruz, CA 95062 831-426-1244 http://www.volkscafe.com > From: Tom Young <tomyoung1@ATTBI.COM> > Reply-To: Tom Young <tomyoung1@ATTBI.COM> > Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 10:35:36 -0800 > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: CV article now available - I'm confused (long) > > You are right. I knew it had to have something to do with the pressures > being felt by the various faces of the CV joint and my cardboard tube didn't > do justice to the situation. > > Just to be doubly sure, I stuck some stiff wire through the cardboard tubes > at "C" and "D" and slid my middle fingers into the tube, with the index and > pinky fingers outside, resting against the wires. Now my index and pinky > fingers played the role of the outer hub of the CV joints and the wires > played the role of the inner hub. Trying the various orientations again it > was very clear that the pressures were different only when the axle moved to > the other side of the transmission, irrespective the 2 joints orientation. > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Tom Young '81 Vanagon > Lafayette, CA 94549 '82 Westfalia > --------------------------------------------------------------- > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ben McCafferty" <ben@volkscafe.com> > To: "Tom Young" <tomyoung1@attbi.com>; <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:57 AM > Subject: Re: CV article now available - I'm confused (long) > > > Hi Tom, > Thanks for the clarification, this is exactly the feedback I'm looking for. > You are correct in stating that I didn't intend "rotation of the axle", > rather, "pressure on the faces of the inner and outer ball hubs". In other > words, you're trying to get pressure on the opposite face by moving the > axles around. > > That said, I still stand behind my assertions in the diagrams. While your > discussion is close to the mark, it misses one point--where the pressure > gets applied, not just which direction it's being applied from. Try it this > way: hold your hands in front of you with your fingers pointed towards each > other, and interlace your fingertips. Pretend your left hand is an outer > ball hub, and your right hand is an inner ball hub. Assume we're talking > about the inner right rear CV for a moment. As the tranny applies forward > force to the outer hub (your left hand), the inner ball hub (your right > hand) feels that force on the trailing edges. Now flip your hands over (not > easy to do!) and assume that your left hand is the outer hub for the inner > left rear CV. As forward force is applied to it by the tranny, you will > quickly see that the force on the inner ball hub is felt on the opposite > faces, i.e. the other side of your right fingers. The same holds true for > both outer joints. That takes care of the A-B Tranny C-D to D-C Tranny B-A > scenario. The A-B Tranny C-D to C-D Tranny A-B scenario can be proven in > the same manner.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »