Sure it isn't supposed to regardlessness?
That is a real tounge twister ............. we need to get that added to
Congerssional Bill sometime.

Stan

On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 21:31:22 +1300 Andrew Grebneff
<andrew.grebneff@STONEBOW.OTAGO.AC.NZ> writes:
> >  irregardless
>
> not regardless?
>
>

________________________________________________________________
Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com