Skip to main content
Gerry | Vanagon
Checking account...
← vanagon.com home · Continue the discussion in the forum
Subject:Re: engine conversion
From:Ben T
Date:Thu, 6 Mar 2003 08:59:01 EST

In a message dated 3/6/03 5:41:38 AM Pacific Standard Time, wilden1@JUNO.COM
writes:

<< Sure it isn't supposed to regardlessness?
 That is a real tounge twister ............. we need to get that added to
 Congerssional Bill sometime. >>

Mr. cat lover Stan,

Darva tongue twister on Bill who?

Regardless of what the Canuck-lost-down-south thinks, many (myself NOT
included) have accepted the nonstandard form of the word (i.e., irregardless)
as acceptable. The earliest edition Amurkan published is from 1973. The
irregular form of the word is there regardless of whether it has anything to
do with the engine conversion thread or not.

BenT