

| Subject: | Re: Maximum engine power and Performane Chip Discussion |
| From: | Nancy Eilers-Hughes |
| Date: | Fri, 14 Mar 2003 20:55:09 -0700 |
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 13:54:05 -0500 From: David Brodbeck <gull@GULL.US> Subject: On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Mark Keller wrote: > The Digifant Fuel system works largley by monitoring input from the O2 > sensor. By monitoring the O2 sensor with an averaging multimeter you > can see the average fuel mixture theengine is actually getting. Because > the engine is constantly getting a little less and a little more than > this average, it probably isn't even producing the same power it could > if it got a constant mixture. What you're looking for seems almost impossible in a vehicle without a throttle position sensor. Unfortunately, the AFM reading is dependent on *both* the throttle position, and the RPM, and thus is insensitive to engine load. Additionally, since there is no manifold pressure/vacuum sensor, the ECU is left with *no* way of knowing what the throttle position is. *IF* the throttle position is known, the easiest route to what you're looking for would be to program the chip with the optimal fuel/air map algorithm (i.e. the typical 17:1 mixture), adjusted based on the O2 sensor output. Additionally, that algorithm could incorporate an "enrichment factor" calculated from comparison of the engine RPM versus throttle position, integrated over a set period (similar to a typical PID algorithm). A slow rate of RPM change, relative to the throttle position, would indicate heavy load and result in additional enrichment. A quick rate of change would indicate no/light load, and the "enrichment factor" would be 1 (i.e. the non-adjusted basic fuel/air map). Using this scenario, you could achieve maximum power under heavy load, with minimal impact under light loading conditions, but overall the fuel efficiency and emissions would still suffer. Keith Hughes '86 Westy TiiCo, Marvin
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »