

| Subject: | Re: gutless AND unreliable... |
| From: | Jim |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Mar 2003 16:35:24 -0800 |
Sean Garrett wrote: >In defense of the WBXR I seem to remember a post a couple days ago from >someone boasting +200,000 miles on their original engine with no bottom end >maintenance (rebuilds?). > That might be me. 230k miles on the original motor. Still uses *no* oil between changes and even though it needs a reseal, it's stone reliable. I'll redo the heads in the next couple weeks and i have no doubt that it'll be good for another 100k. Jim
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »