

| Subject: | Fw: Re: Fw: unethical sales |
| From: | selten |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Apr 2003 09:26:54 -0600 |
Sorry for the WOB , Just B***ching I guess about the one that got away. When it is all said and done I still have a Westy of my own ! Tom Czerniak ----- Original Message ----- From: "selten" <selten2@attbi.com> To: "Vanagon man" <vgonman@msn.com>; <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 9:23 AM Subject: Re: Re: Fw: unethical sales > I agree that he was within his right to get all he could but to post > it as he did then essentially auction the price up was not a good way to go > . A more forthright way would have been to post a revised ad stating > something like "due to popular demand the prior mentioned van is now being > sold Best offer." > Part of this for me is the fact that it would be a long distance sight > unseen purchase for most of the potential buyers. Having bought and sold my > last 6 cars and 2 motorcycles via the net, Being forthright in such a > transaction is a great commodity to experience. It makes things painless and > suprise free! > > T.C. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Vanagon man" <vgonman@msn.com> > To: "selten" <selten2@ATTBI.COM>; Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 8:57 AM > Subject: Re: Re: Fw: unethical sales > > > > I just got an email from the fellow saying it was sold.but did talk to him > > Monday night on the phone where he told me he wanted $1500 for > > it........after posting $1000......... > > > > I offered to overnight money, wire, etc., But truth be known he actually > was > > hustling all of us against each other. > > > > I have no bad feelings about it, for it was not meant to be. But, if > anyone > > out there in the future was to sell a van on the list and intends to use > the > > same practices, why not just say best offer OVER $1000, or sold to highest > > offer................. > > > > I think the fellow was surprised that he got as many calls on it as he > did. > > Thus, he took the most he could get. Can't get mad at him for that. > Little > > does he know, I would have paid $3 k for a motorless van in that kind of > > shape. He really lost out on me! > > > > Adam P > > 81 Westy "The Brick " > > 70 Single Cab "Whitey" > > 74 Beetle "Ol Yeller" > > 73 Transporter (STILL at paint shop) > > 1988 Vanagon Wolfsburg > > 1976 Transporter (New CA bus) > > 1974 412 "Goldmember" > > Used Vanagon Parts for sale (mostly aircooled) > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "selten" <selten2@ATTBI.COM> > > To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 7:27 AM > > Subject: Re: Fw: unethical sales > > > > > > > I have attempted to buy this van and while I will agree with your point > > > about cash in hand takes it at 1000.00 It seems to me that the sale and > > > bidding up is happening via e-mail, because no one from the Memphis > area > > > has yet dropped 1000.00 on this. I say this because I have left repeated > > > messages at his # and each time get what seems to be his workplace with > > the > > > message about being out of town this week. Now personally ,If I aim to > > sell > > > a vehicle and target it to a specific audience via this list then I am > > damn > > > well going to be home and will also be talking to people not just > through > > > the computer. > > > I have been trying to talk to the guy so that I can forward funds > to > > > secure the van. If I had secured it and had driven down from Chicago > > > getting a tow vehicle, helper , time off and tow dolly , showing up and > > > finding out that the price had gone up , I would have been ready to > shoot > > > some one. For the flamers, the last bit was a statement of rage not > > action! > > > Any way, it looks like a nice van but the transaction is just a > > little > > > too flaky for me. Have at it. > > > Tom Czerniak > > > 87 Westy RED BRICK > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Aristotle Sagan" <killer_jupiter@HOTMAIL.COM> > > > To: < > > > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:01 AM > > > Subject: Re: Fw: unethical sales > > > > > > > > > > Sorry Marc, > > > > If you are right here, CASH in hand with a grand, before anyone else > > says > > > > I'll give you 1,750 bucks for it... then it should be yours. > > > > > > > > But... even I, who has only sold a couple of cars using classifieds, > > have > > > > been stood up by people "coming down with the money". > > > > > > > > Nope, never again. > > > > > > > > If the guy has an offer for 1750, first person to get him the CASH > > should > > > > walk away with it. If you don't believe him, don't buy it. > > > > > > > > I do agree he should have said "or best offer". > > > > > > > > You expect too much to make him walk away from 750 bcks. > > > > > > > > Wire him 2 grand and I'm sure it's yours. > > > > > > > > tim in san jose > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: Marc Perdue <marcperdue@ADELPHIA.NET> > > > > >Reply-To: Marc Perdue <marcperdue@ADELPHIA.NET> > > > > >To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > > > > >Subject: Re: Fw: unethical sales > > > > >Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 22:09:12 -0500 > > > > > > > > > >You're being called an "auctioneer" because you said the "asking > price > > is > > > > >$1000", you didn't say "or best offer". Yet you're entertaining > higher > > > > >offers > > > > >and having people "bid" the price up. To maintain your ethical > > > integrity, > > > > >you > > > > >should sell it to the first person that offered to pay you $1,000 or > > > > >withdraw to > > > > >offer the van for sale and re-list it as "$1,000 or best offer." > > > > > > > > > >Marc Perdue > > > > > > > > > >isdn128 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Are you calling me an ""auctioneer"" before or after you offered > to > > > > >match > > > > > > any offer? I keep my word, but yes it is true that many people > > have > > > > > > offered more! > > > > > > > > > > > > Jim > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. > > > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail > > > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »