

| Subject: | Re: 82 Failed CA Smog Test- help! |
| From: | Mike Miller |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Apr 2003 23:47:30 -0700 |
Used to be that higher octane fuel had more cleaners but I've been told, by my former brother in law who's been in the gas cooking industry most of his life, that now almost all fuel has a bunch of cleaners, same amount no matter the octane, because modern fuel injection demands to be kept very clean to work right. Mike On 4/14/03 9:56 PM, "Tom Young" <tomyoung1@ATTBI.COM> wrote: > Frankly, that sort of advice makes absolutely no sense to me. Higher octane > allows a car to run at a higher compression ratio without pinging. But, if > the vehicle isn't pinging, what's the point of running High Octane, and what > could that possibly do to help a vehicle with a high idle CO pass the smog > test? What's the logic here? > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Tom Young '81 Vanagon > Lafayette, CA 94549 '82 Westfalia > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Richard Brassaw" <sendmeanemail@EARTHLINK.NET> > To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 9:14 PM > Subject: Re: 82 Failed CA Smog Test- help! > > >> I've had several mechanics tell me to run a couple of tanks of High >> Octane before getting smoged. Also, when was the last time a new Cat >> was put on--it might be time. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf >> Of S.Harrison >> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 9:03 PM >> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >> Subject: 82 Failed CA Smog Test- help! >> >> I passed all aspects of the test but the CO% at idle -- I was at 5.56%, >> with >> a maximum allowable of 2.00. The CO% at 2500 RPM measurement was fine, >> about >> 0.62%. >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »