

| Subject: | Re: Bus Depot OXS Dilemma; Where Is the Truth? |
| From: | Dave Katsuki |
| Date: | Sun, 27 Apr 2003 22:32:59 -0400 |
George, I've been using the "generic" oxy sensors for 15 years or so, on a variety of cars. Never any problems (they always drive fine & pass inspection.) I've gotten them at the Bus Depot and from other vendors. If you buy the plug-compatible or OEM sensor, you will probably pay 3x the cost of the generic. Don't worry about it, is my experience. Dave 90 Westy At 4:37 PM -0400 4/26/03, George Goff wrote: >It came to light this morning that the OXS of my van needs replaced and a >trip tomorrow demands that it be done today. Since I am 1 of 2 Vanagon fools >who my VW parts guy ever sees, he, of course, does not have one on the shelf, >but I do have two other OXS's. One used (Bosch p/n 13931) and the other >brand new (Bosch p/n 13913). For the sake of brevity, I'll refer to them as >x31 and x13, respectively. > >The new x13 was purchased from the Bus Depot (BD) who offered it as an exact >equivalent of the x31 sans the connector. The used x31 has about 20 Kmi on >it and it is the exact Bosch replacement for the VW supplied part. > >I would like to install the new x13 which leads to my dilemma: Since I have >reason to doubt the veracity* of what comes from the Bus Depot, I hesitate to >use it. For one thing, the cold resistance's of the heaters of the x13 and >the x31 are different by a factor of 2. Also, I have no way of comparing the >active characteristics of this unknown, the x13, with the ideal. Above all >else, Bosch does not list the x13 as a substitute for the x31. > >Beyond relying on hearsay and anecdote, is there any authentication for the >use of the Bosch p/n 13913 OXS on a Vanagon 2.1L engine? > >*For those of you who bristle at my choice of words, look up their meaning >and go beyond the first definition which you may find before you are >compelled to defend the weak and beleaguered. Should you still feel cause, >contact me because I have ample documentation and hard goods as evidence to >the veracity of MY words. > >George
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »