

| Subject: | Re: Clutch cylinders |
| From: | Stan Wilder |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Apr 2003 08:53:36 -0500 |
Look in your check book. Check your account balance. If you've got the time and money replace them both. If you just want to keep rolling, only replace the broken / bad part. The other part will let you know. Slave cylinders don't fail all at once they give a fair amount of warning so it won't strand you anywhere. Stan Wilder On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 06:40:05 -0700 Jeffrey Earl <jefferrata@YAHOO.COM> writes: > I need to replace my clutch Master Cylinder (MC) soon. > How do I know? The little drip on my shoe told me so. > The clutch Slave Cylinder (SC), on the other hand, > exhibits no leakage or other signs of impending > failure. > > Some Vanagon owners claim that when the MC goes, the > SC isn't far behind, so one should replace BOTH. > Others say that the new, strong MC will blow the seals > on a marginal SC so, again, replace them both. > Yet others say (who ARE all these people, anyway?), > "No, that's only for BRAKE slave cylinders, which > endure far higher levels of heat and dirt and abuse. > Don't fix what ain't broken." > > So what to do: replace them both, or just the leaker? > > Thanks in advance! > > Jeffrey Earl > 1983 diesel Westfalia "Vanasazi" > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > http://search.yahoo.com > > ________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »