

| Subject: | Re: height of '88 Westy? |
| From: | Jay L Snyder |
| Date: | Fri, 23 May 2003 15:29:40 -0400 |
You could pick up an inch or so by deflating the tires! Pack a 12V pump
with your stuff.
Jay
"Coyne, Annie" <ACoyne@GLHEC.ORG>@gerry.vanagon.com> on 05/23/2003 03:14:53
PM
Please respond to "Coyne, Annie" <ACoyne@GLHEC.ORG>
Sent by: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
cc:
Subject: height of '88 Westy?
Can anyone comment on the precision of the stats listed at vanagon.com,
specifically as regards the height of a 1988 Vanagon Westy? I think I've
found a reliable carrier at a good price, but . . . .
I was just told that if the vehicle is over 7' (84") tall, I'll need a
different transporter and another $350.
The stats listed at http://www.vanagon.com/info/years/1988/index.html for
the camper show a height of 80.9", and shows the skylight as standard
material ( I had previously been warned that it was the skylight that
caused
the height to exceed the 7' mark).
I think I'm almost willing to take a chance on skylight damage, if I have
to
- but I'm curious as to what this group has to say.
Thanks in advance!
Annie
This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains
information that may be privileged, confidential or copyrighted under
applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e-mail,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender
by return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system. Unless
explicitly and conspicuously designated as "E-Contract Intended",
this e-mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment,
or an acceptance of a contract offer. This e-mail does not constitute
a consent to the use of sender's contact information for direct marketing
purposes or for transfers of data to third parties.
Francais Deutsch Italiano Espanol Portugues Japanese Chinese Korean
http://www.DuPont.com/corp/email_disclaimer.htmlHave something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »