Skip to main content
Gerry | Vanagon
Checking account...
← vanagon.com home · Continue the discussion in the forum
Subject:Re: So... what is the answer for these poor lights?
From:Damon Campbell
Date:Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:44:09 -0700

Is it really necessary to run 4 wires with the
corresponding 4 relays?  Is this just to prevent
losses by halving the current through any one wire, or
for redundancy, or something else my electrically
feeble mind can't follow...

My relay job just used 2 wires and two SPDT relays to
control both high and low.  I'm happy with the
results, just wondering why the guru suggested what he
did...

Thanks,
-Damon

--- David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET> wrote:
> At 02:16 PM 6/5/2003, Ri wrote:

>                  2) Rewire the system to use relays
> for switching and have
> the headlight switch and dipping switch only control
> the relays.  Run new
> heavier feeds direct from the battery to supply
> actual power to the
> lights.  There should be four feeds, one each for
> high and low on each
> side, and each one should be fused within a few
> inches of the battery.  The
> power feeds should be as short as reasonable and the
> relays can be wherever
> is convenient along them.  The relay control wiring
> (which formerly powered
> the actual lights) can be extended to any length as
> convenient.  It's
> already fused for each beam.  This scheme will
> require four SPDT relays or
> two DPDT relays -- whichever is easier and/or
> results in shorter runs for
> the feed wires is best.  If your relays are
> physically located together or
> if you use DPDT relays, can drive using only two of
> the original four
> headlight feeds

=====
'84 Westy (Sparky)
'65 Kharma Ghia (Dharma)

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com