

| Subject: | Re: So... what is the answer for these poor lights? |
| From: | Damon Campbell |
| Date: | Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:44:09 -0700 |
Is it really necessary to run 4 wires with the corresponding 4 relays? Is this just to prevent losses by halving the current through any one wire, or for redundancy, or something else my electrically feeble mind can't follow... My relay job just used 2 wires and two SPDT relays to control both high and low. I'm happy with the results, just wondering why the guru suggested what he did... Thanks, -Damon --- David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET> wrote: > At 02:16 PM 6/5/2003, Ri wrote: > 2) Rewire the system to use relays > for switching and have > the headlight switch and dipping switch only control > the relays. Run new > heavier feeds direct from the battery to supply > actual power to the > lights. There should be four feeds, one each for > high and low on each > side, and each one should be fused within a few > inches of the battery. The > power feeds should be as short as reasonable and the > relays can be wherever > is convenient along them. The relay control wiring > (which formerly powered > the actual lights) can be extended to any length as > convenient. It's > already fused for each beam. This scheme will > require four SPDT relays or > two DPDT relays -- whichever is easier and/or > results in shorter runs for > the feed wires is best. If your relays are > physically located together or > if you use DPDT relays, can drive using only two of > the original four > headlight feeds ===== '84 Westy (Sparky) '65 Kharma Ghia (Dharma) __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »