The best results seem to be from converted diesels, rather than converted
wbxs.  Just a comment.

Jay ('85 w/BB rebuilt wbx)

John Runberg <jrunberg@MAC.COM>@gerry.vanagon.com> on 06/02/2003 01:04:35
PM

Please respond to John Runberg <jrunberg@MAC.COM>

Sent by:    Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>

To:    vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM
cc:
Subject:    Re: I4

Let the flames begin!

I (for one) like the I4 in my Jetta, liked the one in the Golf before it,
and LOVE the one in my friend's 82 Vanagon. The Golf engine had 174,000 and
ran great (ableit some lifter clatter) when I had to let it go and my '99
Jetta has 117, 000 w/ just regular maintenace. Those are far more miles
than I'd ever expect out of my WBX.

john
90 Carat (on it's 3rd engine? who knows...)

> PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE DONT USE THE i FOUR. THEY ARE JUNK!!! i HAVE WORKED
ON
> SO MANY OF THEM AND THEY ARE ALL PROBLEMATIC.

This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains
information that may be privileged, confidential or copyrighted under
applicable law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e-mail,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.  Please notify the sender
by return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system.  Unless
explicitly and conspicuously designated as "E-Contract Intended",
this e-mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment,
or an acceptance of a contract offer.  This e-mail does not constitute
a consent to the use of sender's contact information for direct marketing
purposes or for transfers of data to third parties.

 Francais Deutsch Italiano  Espanol  Portugues  Japanese  Chinese  Korean

            http://www.DuPont.com/corp/email_disclaimer.html