

| Subject: | Re: Bilstein Shocks Vs. Stock |
| From: | Damon Campbell |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Jul 2003 10:28:20 -0700 |
A spring/damper system is exactly that... a system. You take into account mass, position, velocity, damping coefficients, etc. into the equation. A heavier mass (ie. westy instead of transporter) requires more damping to keep the natural frequency in check... I've tried modelling a 4-wheel independent autombile based on rudimentay spring damper systems, and it is a beeyatch due to the indeterminate nature of the equation, but the principles are the same, and certainly not a "one solution only = stock settings" kind of thing. Consumer products are designed for the masses - not you. I personally like the ride of my stock westy, but it wouldn't do for those wacky syncro guys, for example. Just like anything, it's a matter of knowing the effects of the changes you want to make (stiffer springs require stiffer dampers, etc.). Have fun putting along, -damon --- "Phil S." <napszeerf@YAHOO.COM> wrote: > If Bilstein shocks and stock shocks have the same > travel distances then i dont see why adding an > aftermarket shock would override the factory > engineers > design...all you are doing is changing the stiffness > for lack of a better word. I wonder if the factory > suspension engineers designed the vanagon to have > five > hundred pounds of weight on the drivers side of the > van(Westfalias, Aventurwagen) > > Now changing factory SPRINGS...that changes > everthing. > > Phil 84' Westy w/Tiico ===== '84 Westy (Sparky) '65 Kharma Ghia (Dharma) __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »