

| Subject: | Re: R12 or R134? |
| From: | Keith A. Hughes |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:44:04 -0700 |
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:41:13 -0700 > From: "Mike D." <md03@XOCHI.COM> > Subject: R12 or R134? > > I've got an 85 Westy, purchased about 4 months ago. When first > purchased, the AC worked poorly. After being in the shop and not > getting much driving, I recently discovered the AC didn't work at > all. It sounds like the compressor engages, but when I tested the > valves there was no R12 pressure at all. > > So my theory is that there is a slow leak (6 months or so to fully discharge). Bad theory! If you *fully* discharge, i.e. no pressure, in 6 months, that qualifies as a Large leak. Whichever way you go, you should fix the leak first, 'cause it isn't going to get better :-) And whatever else you do, *IF* you switch to R-134A, EVACUATE the system first. While this is important with R-12, its crucial with R-134A. The air in the system is non-condensable, raising the already high head pressures, AND the PAG/Ester oils are hygroscopic (i.e. they absorb water). The moisture in the system can combine with the oils before being adsorbed by the drier, resulting in poor oil circulation/lubrication, and compressor going BOOM. > So, any advice on the pros & cons refilling with R12 or converting to > R134? My theory is that if there is a slow leak, I'd rather be > leaking R134 than R12. Cost is definitely an issue, so the $40 > do-it-yourself R134 conversion is attractive (assuming that having a > mechanic fix the leak and refil with R12 would cost hundreds of > dollars). A lot depends on where you live. Here in Phoenix (with temps of 117�F already this summer) R-134A is a bad choice. It does not cool nearly as well as R-12, has significantly higher head pressures (especially at high ambient temps), and is not miscible with mineral oil (used in R-12 systems). At a minimum, when you switch to R-134A, you need to replace the receiver/drier, drain the oil from the compressor, and add the PAG or Ester oils used for 134A. Any O-rings disturbed by the repair operation should be replaced as well, as they are not compatible (undisturbed O-rings should be fine, given the small amount of surface area exposed to the system). As for R-12, local Phoenix rates run $50-80 per can (actual cost is $21-23 per can in case quantities), plus labor, if you have a shop do it. You can expect to be charged for at least 3 cans for an empty, evacuated system, and you'll have to find a shop with R-12 Recovery/Recycle equipment in order to service it. Unfortunately, both choices are kinda ugly. If you live where temps are less than 100�F, then the R-134A may work fine. There are some good R-12 replacements (like Freezone, FridgC, etc.) but the downside is finding someone with the recovery/recycle equipment dedicated to that material the next time you need a repair. So far, I'm sticking with R-12, waiting for a better option. Keith Hughes
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »