

| Subject: | Re: Help needed for 88 Cabriolet emissions failure |
| From: | Mike Miller |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Aug 2003 17:40:06 -0700 |
If your cat was as hot as it could get perhaps time for a new cat? Mike On 8/18/03 4:24 PM, "Karen Gritis" <gritis@ATTGLOBAL.NET> wrote: > Please take a minute to help us out, even though this problem isn't Vanagon > related. (If it helps, I have a Vanagon.) My daughter and I went to get her > Cabriolet emissions tested today. We were shocked that it failed. > > The numbers were as follows: > HC ppm - 15 mph - (limit 152) - actual 56 > CO% - 15 mph - (limit .86) - actual .64 > NO ppm - 15 mph - (limit 1203) - actual 1614 > > So everything except NO was within acceptable limits, although the inspector > said that all the values were higher than they should be. There is no visible > smoke. The inspector said that it could possibly be the catalytic converter > going bad, but he didn't know for sure. > > The engine seemed to run hot during testing. There is a water temperature > gauge with a light in the middle, the Cabriolet was running half way between > the light and the hot zone. I have the same gauge in my vanagon and I usually > run just to the left of the light. > > One other thing that might have some bearing on this is that it took 4 tries > for the inspector to get a reading. He finally had to take apart the probe > that goes into the tailpipe and blow compressed air through it. Then he was > able to complete the three cycles. So anyway, the car was pretty hot by the > time he could get a reading. > > Any ideas?? Any suggestions?? Any and all are appreciated. > > Thanks, > Karen > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »