

| Subject: | Re: Piston question... |
| From: | Mike Miller |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Sep 2003 12:01:30 -0700 |
An eyebrow? This raises most everything [and no smart-alecky comments from BenT and his ilk either.] Mike On 9/16/03 9:34 AM, "Ken Lewis" <kdlewis_wasting_time@ACCESS4LESS.NET> wrote: > This claim raises an eyebrow...... > > "Most of our customers with 2WD non-camper Vanagons are > reporting 25-27 MPG with well over 100hp!" > > > > ----- Original Message Follows ----- >> Hello all, >> What do the tech dudes on the list think of these? Are >> they a good piston? And what about going to a 2.2 ltr.? >> Are there any negatives? >> just curious, >> jesse >> 89 carat >> >> > http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=33623&item=2 > 432982510 > > Ken Lewis > 86 Transporter Crew Cab, 60 T-5 Coupe > http://neksiwel.20m.com/ O2 sensor monitor gadget, my > cars, Vanagon Tech > http://EB03.20m.com/ Everybus 2003 pictures > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »