

| Subject: | Re: Rear Seat/Bed Question |
| From: | Philip Simmons |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Sep 2003 20:50:41 -0700 |
Untrue. As a prosecutor (and former defense counsel) I have had the ability to invoke such language...not often but when you need it its good to have. It also has to do with discovery and privilege. Both legal "terms of art" with specific rules depending on the jurisdiction. Anyway, I'd cut her some slack. -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of David Brodbeck Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 7:58 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: Rear Seat/Bed Question On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, David Beierl wrote: > C'mon George, you know perfectly well that she has no control over what > Reed, Smith puts on the bottom of her outgoing emails. It's something that > a lot of companies, and especially a lot of lawyer companies, do. They're so often contradictory (or, as in this case, used in nonsensical situations) that I suspect they have no actual legal standing at all, making them a useless annoyance. See also: http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/ David Brodbeck, N8SRE '82 Diesel Westfalia '94 Honda Civic Si
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »