

| Subject: | Re: reliability of 2.1L compared to 1.9L |
| From: | Joseph Fortino |
| Date: | Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:19:04 +0000 |
Try driving in norcal where the avg speed is like 80 in all lanes it sucks sometimes, my 1.9l loves to drive at 65mph, but somedays i do 70mph and it loves it blows the carbon out. yesterday i was driving with my arm out the window and its like i'm an alien on another planet. LOL watch those little rocks they feel like gas hitting your arm. * maybe some don't enjoy driving anymore. * my fav is getting out of work at like 9 or 10 at night and driving down the hwy with my left arm just relaxing on the door, then all of a sudden lights coming up on my like heat sinking missles. hehe take it eazy Joe BTW i'm total happy with the 1.9l did'nt want to go big'er > -----Original Message----- > From: David Brodbeck [mailto:gull@GULL.US] > Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 01:31 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: reliability of 2.1L compared to 1.9L > > On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, John Rodgers wrote: > > > My 88 GL turns 3800 at 65 mph. I NEVER run it faster. Of course the > > "Impatient American" in their SUV's and what-have-you hate me on the > > highway. > > That seems prudent to me. I cruise at a steady 60 mph in my diesel -- the > same speed I used to drive my '75 aircooled bus. At first it seems pretty > slow, but after a while you get in the groove of just cruising along with > your elbow on the window sill and letting the usual freeway chaos flow > around you. > > It's surprisingly relaxing. > > VW vans are slower-paced, look-around-at-the-scenery sorts of vehicles. > In my opinion, if you have to get somewhere in a hurry you should be > driving something else. (That's what my Civic is for!) > > > David Brodbeck, N8SRE > '82 Diesel Westfalia > '94 Honda Civic Si >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »