

| Subject: | Re: Helmet laws |
| From: | David Brodbeck |
| Date: | Thu, 25 Sep 2003 21:12:30 -0400 |
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Mark Tuovinen wrote: > The ability to record > this information is not to spy on us as much as it is for diagnostics, > they need to know what the car was doing when the problem occurred if > they are to be able to repair it. The driver claimed to have been just > driving along when the engine died. Death came with several broken > valves, two destroyed pistons and connecting rods, and matching windows > on each side of the block. Warranty denied! Yup. I frankly can't see any personal rights or privacy violations in the engine computer recording RPM and control inputs for a short period before an accident. I think objections to this are mostly a gut-level reaction by people who realize they will no longer be able to put one over on car manufacturers or insurance companies. Things like On*Star that actually log where you drive do seem like they're ripe for abuse, though. David Brodbeck, N8SRE '82 Diesel Westfalia '94 Honda Civic Si
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »