

| Subject: | Re: Rebuild? was: Model/year recommandation |
| From: | Wesley Alden Pegden |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Oct 2003 01:56:01 -0500 |
I'm on an original '84 engine for 175,000 miles now. wes On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Art McGinn wrote: > rob: the last vw air-cooled engines, '83.5 being the last year sold, were > state of the art for that porche-type engine (the original was designed by > mr. porsche himself). porsches were air-cooled until not that long ago. no > reason to believe the air-cooled vw engine won't go for a very long time if > one just changes the oil when supposed to. the pre-fuel-injected models had > a touchy exhaust valve in no. 3 which could result in a blown engine if not > kept properly adjusted but the later fuel-injected models had hydraulic > valves that did not require adjustment. air-cooled is not as powerful as > water-cooled but for an old vw bus hand, it doesn't really matter. my '82 > cruises at 65-70 on the freeway and that's just fine. elsewhere, well, the > right lane is also just fine. if you're in a hurry, a vw van is the wrong > vehicle. cheers, art, '82 westy > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rob S." <iH8myISP@SUSCOM.NET> > To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 10:57 PM > Subject: Rebuild? was: Model/year recommandation > > > > What exactly goes wrong that requires every vanagon to have an engine > > rebuild done around 100K miles? > > > > My 82 is original un-rebuilt motor (as far as I know) and it runs out > > VERY strong. > > > > with 92,000 and a broken odometer... should I be ready to spend for a > > rebuild soon, regardless of how good it runs now? > > > > should I not fix the odometer so that it never reaches that dreaded > > 100K mark (where the engine will instantly destroy itself)? > > > > -Sealover > > > > > > On Thursday, October 9, 2003, at 12:19 AM, Art McGinn wrote: > > > > > jp: as a longtime bus owner and later a vanagon owner, i have a very > > > strong bias against the water-cooled vanagon and a very strong > > > preference > > > for the air-cooled van, although the latter are getting harder to > > > find. the > > > waterboxer (water-cooled) has inherent heating problems, as most the > > > posts > > > on this list indicate. an air-cooled vanagon in reasonable shape with > > > a > > > recently rebuilt engine and a recently rebuilt transmission (rebuilt > > > engine > > > is necessary since the most recent was new in 1983) could run for many > > > years > > > with minimum trouble if reasonably maintained. good luck on whatever > > > you > > > choose. cheers, art mcginn, san fran, '82 westy (ex-'82 vanagon, > > > ex-'68 bus) > > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »