

| Subject: | Re: safety vs. profit. WAS: Re: Ideal Vanagon |
| From: | Claudio Cella |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Oct 2003 21:05:08 -0700 |
Like i said, RESPONSIBLE trucking companies are never willing to sacrifice safety for profit. No further comment needed on your rant. Claudio Cella ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wesley Alden Pegden" <wes@cs.uchicago.edu> To: "Claudio Cella" <claudiocella@shaw.ca> Cc: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 8:49 PM Subject: safety vs. profit. WAS: Re: Ideal Vanagon > surely you're joking? Yeah, they'll be as concerned about safety as they > need to be to avoid any big financial worries, but in the world we live > in, "responsible", before "company", means as profitable as possible. In > some cases this means they'll want to avoid some big lawsuits and will > implement some safety features. In others (the majority, I might add), > the profit calculation might not come out in safety's favor. Hell, just > at the end of the summer, another worker was killed at the Ford auto plant > in Detroit by a falling piece of steel, as wokeres are made to work on the > ground under the pieces being moved by heavy equipment. I don't have the > exact numbers in front of me, but it was something like the 30th > on-site "accident" related death there in 3 years, at a plant where the > life expectancy is 60 or 65. Do you think that "responsible" truck > building companies never are willing to sacrifice safety for profit? > Maybe you're right, and responsible companies are just nowhere in sight. > > Sorry for this rant---I'll take any further discussion off list. > > later, > wes > > On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Claudio Cella wrote: > > > Responsible trucking companies are NEVER willing to sacrifice safety for > > higher profits. > > > > Claudio Cella > > 87 Vanagon 7 pass. > > 90 Jetta TD > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "David Brodbeck" <gull@GULL.US> > > To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:44 AM > > Subject: Re: Ideal Vanagon > > > > > > > On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Pensioner wrote: > > > > > > > Merling Sauce won GP races without ABS. ABS is for folks who want the > > state > > > > to raise their kids. Upgrade the brakes and learn how best to use em. > > NB: > > > > commercial trucks don't have abs. > > > > > > Most don't have ABS because the trucking companies have managed to fight > > > off the requirement. Trucking companies are always willing to sacrifice > > > safety for higher profits, as is shown by the large number of trucks that > > > fail the inspections they haven't managed to get eliminated yet. There > > > are *some* semis with ABS, however. > > > > > > David Brodbeck, N8SRE > > > '82 Diesel Westfalia > > > '94 Honda Civic Si > > > > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »