

| Subject: | Re: This goddarned ebay thread. |
| From: | Wesley Alden Pegden |
| Date: | Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:27:15 -0600 |
Surely there's some "ebay morals" list where this discussion could have a home?! Or between personal inboxes?! -wes (?!) On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Ware, David (EM, PTL, Contractor, ARC) wrote: > >>But we're not talking > about misrepresentation in the case you mentioned, just the whim of someone > who may or may not decide to pay for an item that they've contracted to > purchase. > > 1. Yes, we are talking about misrepresentation in the case I mentioned, and > exercising some caution by not buying something sight unseen. If the seller > is accurate in his description then the sale does and has gone forward. > > >>If there is dissatisfaction in the > information provided the potential bidder should look elsewhere. > > 2. Uhh, right, but when you are lied to you don't know it until you recieve > or inspect the merchandise. Right? > > >>To place a bid with a laissez-faire attitude that one can just back out of > the obligation because they didn't end up liking what they saw- when they're > now contractually obligated to consummate- demonstrates a lack of integrity > and honor. > > 3. Not the situation in this case. This technique simply guards against > the sort of problems that occured w/ the 1.9 engine. Review # 1 above. > > >>But don't > equate what happened to this man with the unscrupulous behavior of your > "friend" who "only bids on machines that are within driving distance, so he > can check them out before actually going through with the payment". > > 4. Sounds like a good technique to me. That way, if the seller does > misrepresent then you have the opportunity to find that out before you're > out some money. So in your view, the gentleman who got screwed with the 1.9 > engine...if he had driven to pick up the engine and then learned it was a > 1.9 instead of the 2.1 he had been promised, he should have bought the 1.9 > anyway? "unscrupulous" to back out of paying for something that isn't what > was represented? Sorry Mr. Harrison, but you're taking my post to mean > something other than it means. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ware, David (EM, PTL, Contractor, ARC)" <David.Ware@PENSKE.COM> > To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 7:05 AM > Subject: Re: Be careful what you buy on eBay > > > > >>Justifiable flakiness? > > > > No, rather a way of covering one's behind in case the seller in fact > > misreprestented the item. > > > > >>You bid, you buy. > > > > Well, if you agreed to buy a 2.1 engine and drove a few hundred miles to > > discover that it was actually a 1.9 that didn't fit your needs, only a > fool > > would proceed with the purchase. > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »