

| Subject: | Re: Fwd: Observational Inspections |
| From: | tom ring |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:33:08 -0600 |
Twice to the same list with the second as a forward? A rant for no apparent reason? More ice, less booze. On 30 Oct 2003 at 17:22, Doktor Tim wrote: > >To: type2@type2.com > >From: Doktor Tim <doktortim@pop3.rockisland.com> > >Subject: Observational Inspections > > > >How do you know how much is too much or not enough maintenance??? If you > >follow glove box Owner's Manual and Maintenance Manual rules of thumb for > >standard intervals, can you assume that all the rates of WEAR for the way > >you use your car will contribute to the life you expect or the life the > >engineers had in mind?? I say, only if you continue reading and find and > >follow where it says EXTREME CONDITIONS. It tends to require halving all > >intervals for such things as stop and go traffic. Short range use. > >Infrequent use. Commercial use. They way they are typically used. It's a > >rule of thumb approach to a rule of thumb optimum use standard which is > >atypical of the norm in actual use. > > > >Note that every single individual chassis of any makemodelyear in use will > >be used uniquely. It will be subjected to unique events in every way > >except the purpose to travel from A to B. It will be used in a myriad of > >ways more particularly if it is a VW Bus, Vanagon or EuroVan. They can be > >put to 100's of uses. So back to maintenance, how do you know which of > >two rules of thumb to use. I suggest you replace the rules of thumb with > >observations by inspection as the motivating info you need to prove your > >maintenance is not just adequate, but LEAST wasteful of TIME/MONEY to get > >the CHEAPEST RESULTS. > > > >The CHEAPEST result is the anti-thesis to PREMATURE FAILURE if the goal is > >proper fixin' that stays fixed and even need of fixin' at all via rational > >observation inspections. That's why you must establish a criteria as to > >what you expect in terms of fixed for now or a little while. How do we > >eVALUEate this??? The actual needs of your unique chassis for maintenance, > >repair or restoration are all dependent upon actual use, unique in every > >case. On the other hand is what the owner wants or expects. You can know > >what the vehicle needs by rational inspection only. This can't be > >harmonized with irrational wants or expectations of the owner. Of course, > >the owner is in no place to rationalize anything in a state of ignorance. > >Where does he get the data?? He can get all he needs himself with his > >eyes, nose, fingers and ears. I have not found the tongue of use except to > >sense tiny amperage leaks. > > > >Those printed rules of thumb are guides. They cannot hold a candle to > >maintenance by inspection at the correct intervals learned by the notes > >from the inspections as they progress in unique fashion as the miles add > >up from the show room or that Used BUSVANEURO > > > >To get started on documenting the proof of correct maintenance for your > >BUSVANEURO for the unique uses you use it for will require expense to the > >tune of a $0.39 spiral pad and you could probably visit any golf shop and > >nab a pencil for free. You have no need of an eraser. If you want > >perfection of function you can get surveyor's books with nicely columned > >and grided and lined and numbered pages. If you want aesthetics cover the > >book in fabric of choice, like say, matching your custom curtain in the > >Westy. If the inspections are going to be unique, so shall the record book > >be unique. If you succeed in getting down the road the distance the > >engineers had in mind when they designed it you will end up with a series > >of 3 of these 80 page books at 300,000 miles with a vehicle in functional > >order and all weaknesses noted for addressing at the next inspection after > >the parts and lubricants have been obtained and verified as suitable to > >purpose. For digital age nerds, you can iPaq it into a data base or spread > >sheet. > > > >Of VALUE to note is ALL observations. Date, mileage, and notes of > >observations. If you check the oil at every gas fill, note it's level. > >"1/3 above add, add half quart". If you continue you will know in time > >your rate of oil use. If you continue you will know if the rate changes. > >At your convenience you can look into it at the next lube lube change. > >Also note color, smell and texture. Characterize these observations with > >words on paper for future recall. Once you have been 10,000 miles notes > >down the road with your new BUSVANEURO you will know then just how less > >often is required for continued monitoring. > > > >If the oil is dark after only one tank of gas, it's been quickly used up > >by the crud in the engine. It dissolved all the built up crud it could, > >it's fully loaded, it has packed the filter with crud and it's time to > >reduce the rate of wear again after only 300 miles. Change it every 300 > >miles till all the crud is dissolved and removed and you can get perhaps > >1000 mile intervals before it gets overloaded again. If you feel grit, how > >do you think your cam lobes feel about that??? you waited far too long, no > >matter any rule of thumb. This is just simple demonstration of the > >principle. If observation says change it soon before it gets gritty or > >another shade toward dark, change it like the machine is showing you and > >ignore rule of thumb. You have observed facts as a better indicator of > >when to schedule maintenance. > > > >This principle applied with rigor will double the life of everything on > >the car, insure least possible inconveniences like tow bills to the shop > >from hell, and of the highest VALUE will put you in a position of > >knowledge such that you have no need of wasting TIME/MONEY on any > >assumptions or guesses. If someone asked, "How often do you change your > >oil??" You could reply, "Precisly as often as is required to prevent > >excess wear rates." How do you do that? Via observation and notes. > > > >Another note on the principle. If you anticipate by observed weaknesses an > >upcoming issue and take care of it at the next inspection it's not a > >component failure, it's not repair, it's replacement via maintenance > >inspection. With proper inspections for the way you use your car you can > >watch the compression balance and know a year ahead of any failure to > >replace it as a matter of the next inspection. Rule of thumb throws the > >door open to unexpected failure. Observational Inspections done properly > >rules then out. The difference is just that distinct. > > > > > > > ------ Tom Ring K0TAR, ex-WA2PHW EN34hx 85 Westphalia GL Albert 96 Jetta GL The Intimidator taring@taring.org "It is better to go into a turn slow, and come out fast, than to go into a turn fast and come out dead." Stirling Moss
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »