

| Subject: | Re: Observational Inspections |
| From: | Doktor Tim |
| Date: | Fri, 31 Oct 2003 06:44:11 -0800 |
At 07:19 PM 10/30/2003, you wrote: >I certainly must agree that good maintenance is important >to long life from any machine, but one can only spent so >many hours of one's life analyzing data to save a few dollars >worth of car parts.... Yes, but within the context of the discussion, we are talking beginning your inspection with 5 minutes review of notes, not what I would call an onerous task, particularly when that 5 minutes insures that you don't replace parts not needed and do replace all those due accurately. 5 minutes to record results of inspection, 5 minutes to review history as first step in next inspection. Result=no break downs and no wasted money. Invested=pennies for paper and very little time that saves time/money. You comments are ridiculous in this context. >I think I'd rather be camping. Save time/money for camping. Reduce risk of failure at the campsite. Take notes and maintain by observations. Create a base of knowledge to improve decisions, or continue to guess and assume in ignorance.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »