

| Subject: | Re: vanagon Digest - 17 Nov 2003 - Special issue (#2003-1099) |
| From: | trooz |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Nov 2003 23:34:12 -0800 |
I'm looking to buy a Westfalia and it was suggested that the automatic is a better choice than the standard. I've always driven standard because I like the control it gives me. Generally you get better fuel economy too. I've never driven an automatic Vanagon/Westfalia. Is there a reason I should consider an auto over a standard? Thanks, --tabe johnson xtabe AT yahoo DOT com Vancouver, BC I have a '90 Westy with an auto tranny. If I had a choice, I'd opt for a manual transmission for two reasons: 1) you're right; the auto tranny sucks a lot of horsepower that otherwise could be put to the rear wheels. 2) In a pinch, you can push start a vehicle with a manual transmission. To be sure, I've push-started cars with automatic transmissions in my life, but not a VW and nothing with the published caveats about not push-starting the vehicle. Bob Trousdale '90 Westy
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »