

| Subject: | Re: Coolant hose VS tire size? |
| From: | matt sutton |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:51:45 -0500 |
<HEAD> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY> <DIV>Yeah, thought it may be a dumb question. Hadn't consisdered the tire carrier- just couldn't figure if there was some other reason for the part difference. thanks</DIV> <DIV>-matt</DIV> <DIV><BR><BR><BR>-----Forwarded Message----- <BR>From: JordanVw@aol.com <BR>Sent: Nov 21, 2003 12:09 PM <BR>To: msutts@EARTHLINK.NET, vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM <BR>Subject: Re: Coolant hose VS tire size? <BR><BR><XHTML><FONT face=arial,helvetica><FONT lang=0 face=Arial size=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF">In a message dated 11/21/03 11:50:23 AM Eastern Standard Time, msutts@EARTHLINK.NET writes:<BR><BR><BR></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px" TYPE="CITE">I'm researching a jump to 205/70 r14 from 185's. Both Bus Depot and Vanagain list different (and more expensive) coolant hoses if the larger tires are factory equiped. Is this a change I'll have to make if I go to the larger tires?<BR>-Matt Sutton<BR>88GL<BR></BLOCKQUOTE> <DIV><BR><BR>huh? is this a friday trick question? :<)<BR><BR>if youre talking about the hoses above the spare tire carrier (that is the only possible thing i can think of why you asked this question), no. im running a 205 14 in the carrier w/ no probs<BR>chris</FONT> </DIV></FONT></BODY>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »