

| Subject: | Re: Power of a 2.0L Air cooled vs 2.1L??? |
| From: | David Brodbeck |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Dec 2003 19:02:53 -0500 |
On Wednesday 10 December 2003 05:57 pm, Ben huot wrote: > Iv'e been running my 73 with a Single weber since April and i could not be > happier. Am sure that twin weber or Dell would be a bit better than the > single, but mine is just working superb. I was happy with the reliability (much more reliable than the 25-year-old FI system) and fuel economy, but not with the performance. I think it was running lean at high RPMs, though, hence the loss of top end. If I'd kept the van I might have tried a smaller air correction jet in the secondary barrel. > I live in Canada, it's cold, i agree, the single weber dosn't like temp > bellow the freezing point, but only at idle and on low gear (1&2) > acceleration. Yeah, I noticed it really doesn't pay to dip into the secondary barrel at low RPM, especially if the engine is kind of cold. It bogs pretty badly. > >>>>The idle jet has to be adjusted every time the temperature changes a > > little.<<<< > Be more specific here, i only saw a real difference bellow -5C, without my > heating modification. I found I had to tweak it richer in the winter and leaner in the summer, probably due to the lack of carb heat. Granted, not a big deal; a few seconds with a screwdriver. It always idled kind of rich. Trying to change that usually resulted in bad hesitation coming off idle. My linkage problem was that the throttle tended to hang up just before closed, raising the idle to 1500 RPM. Not only was this annoying, but shutting the engine off at that RPM would result in dieseling. Tapping the accellerator would usually snap it shut and bring the idle down. I found out really quickly, too, that you had to leave the throttle arm kind of loose. Trying to snug it up results in the primary throttle sticking open. It just seemed kind of cheaply made to me.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »