

| Subject: | Re: Vanagon list use and generally accepted rules./Rules? What Rules??? |
| From: | John Rodgers |
| Date: | Sun, 14 Dec 2003 12:56:32 -0600 |
I see two things regarding information to be found in the past. First there is an archive, a place for permanent storage of information and there is a list archive. However, it is not a true archive. A true archive would have a system of organization to it to allow some methodical, logical seardhing for data. And there would be an archivist to maintain it and assist in information searches. We have none of that. Then there is the living memory. This is the live active, highspeed memory held by the individuals in the collective membership of the list. This is the fastest data base available anywhere ....... provided all the parts are willing to co-operate. I prefer going to the active membership for answers to questions, because usually a response is available in short order. If my question is beyond the scope, then and only then do I go to the recorded archives, because it is going to take a whole lot of time and enchilada's to dig through the recorded data. I don't mind responding to people's inquirys when I have information or answers to their questions. Regards, John Rodgers 88 GL Driver George Goff wrote: >In a message dated 12/14/03 11:31:00 AM, vwnut@HAWKCOMPUTING.COM writes: > ><< Why do people waste their time telling me to search the archives? >If you don't want to share your opinion and knowledge please don't. >> > >For more than one reason, it has always bothered me to see people directed to >that morass known as the list archive. An archive is supposed to have some >manner of order and ease of use. And, it is also supposed to be regulated by >an archivist. The list archive has none of these elements, so let's call it >what it really is: a data dump. > >To direct someone to a furtive and, perhaps, futile search of the list >archive could mean hours of their precious life whenever their inquiry can be >answered by someone spending a few minutes to compose an e-mail. Replying to their >plea for help by condemning them to the "archive" smacks of the kind of >arrogance which is opposed to the spirit of this list. > >Perhaps it is time to totally delete the bloated contents of the list >"archive" and start anew. > >George > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »