

| Subject: | Re: Tail light update |
| From: | David Brodbeck |
| Date: | Thu, 25 Dec 2003 00:14:14 -0500 |
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, Robert Keezer wrote: > That's right! I second this emotion. The reason the tailight has a lower > wattage than the brake light is to prevent glare , and contrast between the > brake and tail lights for other motorists.. The high voltage craze has > spilled over to the tailights , and I think it's a mistake. Well, considering I've never seen a Vanagon with a bumper that wasn't smashed, maybe there's a reason for this. I agree that some new cars have ridiculously bright tail lights, though. The amber turn signals on some new cars are awful, too -- some of them, I swear, are brighter than brake lights. David Brodbeck, N8SRE '82 Volkswagen Diesel Westfalia '94 Honda Civic Si -- For Sale '86 Volvo 240DL wagon
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »