

| Subject: | Re: 85 wbx 1.9 miss at idle |
| From: | Zoran Mladen |
| Date: | Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:42:44 -0800 |
But you control the idle by the idle adjustment screw initially. Your comment implied that idle is controlled solely by timing - which it is not. Once the timing is set, you adjust the idle via the idle adjustment screw. After that, the idle stabilizer kicks in. So assuming the idle is properly set, the idle stabilizer will have little work to do. The point of my reply was to ensure folks did not think you just set the timing and walk away. Adjusting the idle manually must be performed as well. Z --- Jay L Snyder <Jay.L.Snyder@invista.com> wrote: > > Not really. The idle stabilizer attempts to > maintain 850 to 900 rpm by > changing the timing. This is why it must be > by-passed to correctly set the > timing. > > > Jay > > > > > Zoran Mladen <zmaninco@yahoo.com> on 01/19/2004 > 11:13:48 AM > > To: Jay L Snyder/AE/DuPont@DuPont, > vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > cc: > Subject: Re: 85 wbx 1.9 miss at idle > > > Your statement is incorrect. Adjusting the timing > affects your idle, but the idle is not controlled by > the timing. > > I run my 84 at 5 BTDC, passes emissions easily. You > have a problemm somewhere else. > > Z > > --- Jay L Snyder <Jay.L.Snyder@INVISTA.COM> wrote: > > Emissions. My '85 failed at TDC, passed easily at > > 5ATDC. It does run > > better advanced, but the idle control isn't as > > good--after all, the idle is > > controlled by advancing or retarding the idle. > At > > TDC it controls much > > better. It seems to wander a bit at 5BTDC. > > > > > > Jay > > > > > > > > This communication is for use by the intended > > recipient and contains > > information that may be privileged, confidential > or > > copyrighted under > > applicable law. If you are not the intended > > recipient, you are hereby > > formally notified that any use, copying or > > distribution of this e-mail, > > in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. > Please > > notify the sender > > by return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your > > system. Unless > > explicitly and conspicuously designated as > > "E-Contract Intended", > > this e-mail does not constitute a contract offer, > a > > contract amendment, > > or an acceptance of a contract offer. This e-mail > > does not constitute > > a consent to the use of sender's contact > information > > for direct marketing > > purposes or for transfers of data to third > parties. > > > > Francais Deutsch Italiano Espanol Portugues > > Japanese Chinese Korean > > > > > http://www.DuPont.com/corp/email_disclaimer.html > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" > Sweepstakes > http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus > > > > > > > This communication is for use by the intended > recipient and contains > information that may be privileged, confidential or > copyrighted under > applicable law. If you are not the intended > recipient, you are hereby > formally notified that any use, copying or > distribution of this e-mail, > in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please > notify the sender > by return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your > system. Unless > explicitly and conspicuously designated as > "E-Contract Intended", > this e-mail does not constitute a contract offer, a > contract amendment, > or an acceptance of a contract offer. This e-mail > does not constitute > a consent to the use of sender's contact information > for direct marketing > purposes or for transfers of data to third parties. > > Francais Deutsch Italiano Espanol Portugues > Japanese Chinese Korean > > > http://www.DuPont.com/corp/email_disclaimer.html > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »