

| Subject: | Re: Boston Bob? or GoWesty? |
| From: | John Rodgers |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Jan 2004 07:44:52 -0600 |
Frank, Why are you using a multi-grade oil for break in on a new engine?? In my experiene a straight 30 weight breakin oil was always used for break in. An oil change was done at 500 miles, along with a new filter, and again at 1500 mile. After that a switch to what ever oil is to be used for the life of the engine. In my case, I followed that regimen and then ran 20W50 until last year when I switched to 15W50 Mobil One Synthetic .... something I wish I had done earlier. I really think these engines benefit greatly from the better synthetics. Mine now runs cooler and uses less oil. Regards, John Rodgers 88 GL Driver Chelsea, AL USA Frank Condelli wrote: >In a message dated 21/01/2004 12:07:38 AM Eastern Standard Time, >LISTSERV@GERRY.VANAGON.COM writes: > >I would like to hear Frank Condelli opinion on that subject... > >Yes, I'm sure you and a lot of others would also. BUT, I'm not about to >start a war ! I am still reserving judgement on my Boston Engine engine >situation until I get more miles on the one I have going now. At nearly 2000 miles >it seems fine BUT the oil pressure is still not to my satisfaction or what my >old engine was with nearly 350,000 km. Maybe It's because I'm still on the >10w30 break in oil and besides it's hard to check the oil pressures properly >these days when it's - 25 C most of the time and the van rarely gets driven >long enough to warm up. Yes, the oil pressure is nearly 80 PSI at start up >but what's that say at -25 C ? Not much except you should probably go back to >bed and wait for spring ! I have been making a survey of the oil pressures >of Boston Engine's 2.1 engines and OEM 2.1 engines. You can see the results >so far at _http://members.aol.com/Fkc43/survey.htm_ >(http://members.aol.com/Fkc43/survey.htm) . So far my engine has the lowest oil pressure reading of the >ones reporting. What does that mean ? I don't know as there are far too >many variables to make a proper conclusion. Take it for what's it's worth. >All I can tell you so far is I've had a whole lot of trouble and spent a big >pile of money and time on my engine replacement. If I had to do it all over I >would go with a Subie conversion. I could have done two Subie installs >perfectly with the time and money I have invested so far on replacing with a >boxer engine which I was led to believe would be a simple matter since it was the >same engine that came out. Anyway, don't get me started or we'll end up >with another conversation like you and I had at BusFusion last Spring that kept >up all the other campers. >Cheers, > >Frank Condelli >Almonte, Ontario, Canada >_BusFusion_ (http://members.aol.com/BusFusion/bfhome.htm) a VW Camper >camping event, Almonte, ON, June 10 ~ 13, 2004 >'87 Westy & Lionel Trains >Member: _Vanagon List_ (http://www.vanagon.com/) , _LiMBO_ >(http://www.bcn.net/~limbo/) , _IWCCC_ (http://www.westfalia.qc.ca/) & _CCVWC_ >(http://www.ccvwc.ca/) >Vanagon/Vanagon Westfalia Service in the Ottawa Valley >_STEBRO/Vanagon Stainless Steel Mufflers_ >(http://members.aol.com/Fkc43/stebro.htm) >_Frank Condelli & Associates_ (http://members.aol.com/Fkc43/busindex.html) >or http://frankcondelli.com > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »