

| Subject: | Re: TiiCo California Smog Legal! |
| From: | John Andrew |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Jan 2004 01:33:34 -0700 |
One of the reasons I do not live in California any more! John Andrew 1984 Westfalia with TiiCo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aristotle Sagan" <killer_jupiter@HOTMAIL.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 7:00 PM Subject: Re: TiiCo California Smog Legal! > Wouldn'tchew think the guys in CA would have this 'new ECU' if that were the > case. > > In California, everything has to be as the manufacturer or the EO says or > the visual inspection will kill you. It doesn't have to make sense. > > I am sitting on the sidelines but it doesn't look good for the Tiico team > right now. > > tim in san jose > > >From: Kim Brennan <kimbrennan@MAC.COM> > >Reply-To: Kim Brennan <kimbrennan@MAC.COM> > >To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > >Subject: Re: TiiCo California Smog Legal! > >Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:28:48 -0500 > > > >I don't see any reason why a fuel rail should make any difference. > > > >The fuelrail used on my Tiico has no electrical hookups. That is > > >DIFFERENT< than the fuelrail used on my 5 cylinder. The fuelrail I'm > >using on my Tiico just does away with the individual fuels lines to > >each cylinder. Each injector is still controlled separately with its > >own set of wires to it. > > > >On my 5 cylinder engine, the fuelrail gets the electrical signal and > >distributes it to the injectors. > > > >Again, for CARB approval its entirely possible that Tiico is selling a > >different ECU. > > _________________________________________________________________ > Rethink your business approach for the new year with the helpful tips here. > http://special.msn.com/bcentral/prep04.armx
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »