

| Subject: | Re: NVC: quoting |
| From: | Aristotle Sagan |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:50:37 -0800 |
You mean like the Burning van II post where i have all the responses but none of the original? I still have no idea when this shin-dig is going to take place because... it's been trimmed out of every message. A bit of quote is a very gute thang. tim in san jose ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kim Brennan" <kimbrennan@MAC.COM> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 10:12 AM Subject: NVC: quoting > Sigh, I guess I'm going to be supporting the digest folks soon. > > I'm getting tired of reading some folks messages where a previous > message has been quoted. Except I have a different problem. Some of > these folks quote some of the text, but it has nothing to distingush > that which is quoted, and their replies look like they are part of the > original. > > I've seen it on several folks now (BenT is one, Stan's another, but it > isn't limited to them). > > If you are going to quote someone else's message, please SEPARATE your > message from there's so that it's easier to parse. Better yet, don't > bother to quote. On other listservs, the lesser volume of traffic means > that it is can sometimes be important to quote, to make sure folks know > what context your reply pertains to. Here, on the vanagon list, the > traffic is so high, that we really don't need the quoting most of the > time (except perhaps by digest or archival replies...) >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »