In a message dated 3/4/04 4:23:02 AM, katzd54@YAHOO.COM writes:

<< and, proposed method, like any good scientific theory, can be proven
false. if anyone does this, please follow with standard bleeding method,
see if there is any remaining air, and report to list.

dlk

On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 03:49:06 -0500, Daniel L. Katz <katzd54@YAHOO.COM>
wrote:

>interesting. seems like a reasonable approach for initial fill. but isn't
>the tall filling reservoir in back coupled with open vent in front just
>another artifice for providing a pressure difference?
>
>i would be surprised if this method alone purges all the air. >>

Katz, my man, your words are little more than unfounded speculation.  As it
is, until you try what I suggested, you can't say much with any authority
regarding the matter.

The temporary reservoir does provide head to the system, that's the whole
idea of it, but this approach is so patently obvious that it could hardly be
termed a feux d'artifice.

George