

| Subject: | Re: cooling system design |
| From: | George Goff |
| Date: | Mon, 8 Mar 2004 13:42:06 EST |
In a message dated 3/8/04 6:25:47 AM, dhaynes@OPTONLINE.NET writes: << The main expansion tank is not large enough to allow for this without becoming air bound when cold and overflowing when hot so the second tank is needed.>> If this were the reason, VW would have simply designed a larger pressure tank instead of going to the extra expense and complexity of using two water bottles. <<Another advantage is that without air in the pressurized system, the coolant is less likely to carry entrained air/O2 which avoids cavitation, internal pitting and corrosion. >> As is demonstrated by the billions of cars running around with air bubbles at the top of their pressure tanks, this is no reason for the design either. Cavitation as a result of air ingestion is never a problem on a properly functioning coolant system. The Vanagon's cooling system is what it is because of the geometry of the vehicle with which the engineers had to work. George
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »