

| Subject: | Re: User friendly fuels (was you fixed it..) |
| From: | David Brodbeck |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:53:06 -0500 |
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, David Beierl wrote: > Turbines, though, like ship propulsion plants. Steam turbines in railroad > service haven't worked out too well (understatement) because of dirt and > vibration problems. Well, there's that, and turbines have some serious disadvantages for rail use. They require expensive precision reduction gears to gear them down to wheel speeds, they can't be throttled efficiently except over a small range, and they can't run in reverse. Most of those problems disappear if you use them as part of an electric drivetrain, but it's awfully hard to beat the efficiency of a low-speed diesel engine. Turbines make more sense in ships and airplanes. Both tend to run their engines continuously at a high percentage of total available power. Airplanes can't back up, and ships can carry smaller reversing turbines. David Brodbeck, N8SRE '82 Volkswagen Diesel Westfalia '86 Volvo 240DL wagon
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »