

| Subject: | Re: E-codes w/ 9004 bulbs? |
| From: | Dan |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:40:08 -0400 |
Sounds like all of us with later model vanagons need the south africa grill ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Brodbeck" <gull@GULL.US> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 5:55 PM Subject: Re: E-codes w/ 9004 bulbs? > On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Stan Wilder wrote: > > > Even if you put the fu-fu bulbs in your vanagon they're not going to be as > > bright as they would in the newer cars unless you pump up your voltage a > > little more. > > One interesting point here is the size of the headlights. The same amount > of light concentrated in a smaller area creates more glare than if it's > spread out. > > There's a big difference in visual appearance between a modern projector > headlamp, which might be three inches in diameter, and the huge fishbowl > lights on my '86 Volvo. The Volvo lights throw a decent amount of light > on the road, but when you look at them from in front of the car they don't > seem very bright. The trend right now seems to be to get all the lights > as tiny as possible while cranking up the brightness. > > Personally, I kind of miss the old DOT sealed beams. They worked, they > were consistent, and they were cheap to replace when a rock hit them. > Every time you put in a new bulb, you got a fresh new reflector and lens > assembly. Now we have headlights that vary greatly in beam quality from > car to car, have reflectors that tarnish, lenses that yellow with age, and > cost $300 to replace. > > > David Brodbeck, N8SRE > '86 Volvo 240DL wagon > '82 VW Vanagon Westfalia Diesel >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »