

| Subject: | Re: Bilsteins 2 different types? |
| From: | Robert Keezer |
| Date: | Fri, 14 May 2004 23:39:31 -0700 |
I have a set of the regular Bilsteins and they are a big improvement over KYB. Got them from Shox.com. I replaced the front springs on my former Diesel vanagon Westfalia with front springs from a '85 Westfalia. The ride was improved , as well as front ground clearance. before my front end was sagging , porpoising and bottoming out. Robert K 1982 Westfalia ----Original Message Follows---- From: Tromper <tromper@COMCAST.NET> Reply-To: Tromper <tromper@COMCAST.NET> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: Bilsteins 2 different types? Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 23:02:58 -0700 Kinda had a hunch on that, any subjective comments?? JT -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com]On Behalf Of Ian Anderson Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 10:50 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: Bilsteins 2 different types? Iirc the Heavy Duty ones are firmer and are intended for rougher usage. Ian Anderson Australia ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tromper" <tromper@COMCAST.NET> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2004 3:35 PM Subject: Bilsteins 2 different types? > Hi folks, > > I popped up two different types of Bilsteins > http://www.proamauto.com/page15bbiltci19.htm > Is "Touring" > and > http://www.proamauto.com/page15bu4.htm > > is "Heavy Duty" > > Which ones do folks on the list have and does anybody have any experience > with > them both so they can tell the difference?? > > Thanks > > Tromper > In a state of shock over his "new" Diesel > > > Curiosity Kills more Mice then Cats Robert 1982 Westfalia 1987 Wolfsburg
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »