

| Subject: | Re: Vanagon vs Alternative Vehicles |
| From: | David Cox |
| Date: | Tue, 25 May 2004 19:28:30 +0000 |
Here's an option and one that I'd consider before all domestic detroit metal: http://www.danny-steyn.com/ultimate_windsurfing_van_02.htm David > At 11:07 AM 5/25/2004, David Brodbeck wrote: > >On Tue, 25 May 2004, Tim Schneider wrote: > > > > > gas milage? with a ford triton v10 or 6.0l diesel > > > fuggedaboutit! :-) the diesel version would be > > > cool though, lots of towing capacity, 16.5" of > > > ground clearance as well! > > > >I agree, though the smaller Ford engines aren't bad. THe full-sized Ford > >van I used to drive got around 19 mpg highway new, and 16 by the time I > >sold it. Those numbers are competative with what most people report from > >gasoline Vanagons. It had a 302 V-8, which still gives you quite a bit of > >towing capacity. I imagine fuel economy with the 4.9L V-8 they use now is > >even better. > > I'm suprised they are that good.. Ford or GM > (I had an 88 chevy silverado that got between 17-22!) > > My other two pieces of Detroit steel get lame mpg > 2000 Jeep GC (6 cyl with towing package.. 16 in town.. maybe > 19 on the highway) 1996 Dodge Dakota club cab slt 4x4 > 14mpg *everywhere* > > 90 syncro westy 17-20mpg with a 2.4L gowesty wbx'er > > > -tim
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »