

| Subject: | Re: Vanagon vs Alternative Vehicles |
| From: | Andrew Grebneff |
| Date: | Wed, 26 May 2004 20:12:30 +1200 |
> > <snip> what thoughts The List has about alternatives for the Vanagon. > >Considering that no manufacturer has yet to equal the versatility Sure they do... they just don't sell 'em in the US for some whacko reason (they'd sell like hotcakes). Hiaces have no engine hump in the back (heck, neither would the T3 if VW had laid-out the engine ancillaries properly). Forward-control, full-length flat floor... even available with no rear wheelarch intrusions (J-Low version), 3 wheelbases to choose from. European & US vans are crude ugly boxes which handle like c***. >of our >Vanagons and Westfalias, I would say that rebuilding the vehicle is a >viable option, Absolutely. If you can't find a suitable replacement, maintain, repair & if you like update your type 2. >True, but you will never have to replace a CV joint. A limited-slip diff >helps a lot with traction on slick surfaces, Yup... you lose traction to BOTH wheels! -- Andrew Grebneff Dunedin New Zealand <andrew.grebneff@stonebow.otago.ac.nz> Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »