

| Subject: | Re: no VW sports cars? No longer any Vanagon content |
| From: | Tim Fong |
| Date: | Sat, 29 May 2004 19:52:15 -0700 |
If a NSX is not a "Sports Car", I want my money back. The salesman told me it was a "Sports Car" and that's why I bought it. I guess you can't trust anyone. Tim 1999 Acura Comptech NSX Jason Kirk <Gojira@ADELPHIA.NET> wrote: Actually, the Honda (Acura in the U.S.)NSX is exactly fitting of that definition. Especially, if you go with the list consensus and consider the 914 a sports car. What would you use it for other than going fast? -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Grebneff Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 4:58 AM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: no VW sports cars? No longer any Vanagon content >I'm inclined to think that a sports car is a vehicle that is absolutely >impractical for anything other than going quickly merely for the joy of >it. Whether it's an early Mazda RX-7 picked up for a few hundred dollars >or The Dauer Porsche 962 LeMans (about a million bucks). By that definition the Honda NSX isn't a sportscar... ;-) -- Andrew Grebneff Dunedin New Zealand Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »