

| Subject: | Re: Which is better, synthetic oil or conventional oil? from the AAA website |
| From: | tmiller |
| Date: | Wed, 2 Jun 2004 20:05:15 -0400 |
It is mainly an additive loss issue. The base lubricant has some issues too. Being refined from crude oil, the resultant lube oil has many different sizes of molecules in it. The smaller ones evaporate rather quickly and the heavier ones form deposits and sludge if left in the engine too long. Thus, the viscosity changes by the hour of use. Wax and paraffin cause the oil to thicken in cold weather and thin out when things get hot. Viscosity index improvers and pour point depressants are added to counter these problems but are mechanically broken down with use. For 99 cents/quart, you just don't get the best additive chemistry. TEMiller David Brodbeck wrote: >On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Doug in Calif wrote: > > > >>Frankly, I don't buy some of the "facts" stated by others, that adding >>synthetic oil by itself will keep your engine oil cleaner and thereby >>allow you to drop your change intervals. >> >> > >Is it dirtiness, or viscosity change that requires dino oil to be changed >as frequently as it does? I've heard both claimed, in this thread. > > >David Brodbeck, N8SRE >'86 Volvo 240DL wagon >'82 VW Vanagon Westfalia Diesel > > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »