

| Subject: | Automatic vs. Standard (Manual) |
| From: | Andy Stalick |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:15:14 -0500 |
Hello All- I'm shopping around for an 86+ Westfalia, and one of the big question marks in my head has to do with the transmission. I had a '76 bay-window camper a number of years ago with a manual transmission, and it was a great vehicle, but driving the manual in traffic got really tiresome. The clutch pedel was pretty much vertical, forcing me to lift my entire leg from the hip to operate it. Now, I am pretty tall, so perhaps more average height drivers wouldn't have this configuration. I haven't driven a manual vanagon, so I don't know how the pedals fit me. Another concern is the reliability of the automatic transmission. How well have these things held up? Are they markedly different from the manuals? I don't expect to drive the vanagon like a racecar, so the lower shift-points of the automatic don't bother me that much. Driving moderately around town and on the highway, how do the two transmissions compare? Both mated to the 2.1 wasserboxer. Comments? (Also, if anyone has a sweet deal on a well-kept Westy, near Austin, TX, let's talk!)
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »