

| Subject: | Re: Automatic vs. Standard (Manual) |
| From: | Jim Arnott |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Jun 2004 17:31:38 -0700 |
I've been driving an auto trans 81 ASI weekender for about a month. WHAT A DELIGHT! Harald Rust has raved about his auto Westy for years and now I know why. An absolute joy to drive. If you're interested, this one is for sale. (Need $ to purchase new 1.9 diesel for the Orphan.) I'm located in NE Oregon. Pmail for details. Jim On Thursday, Jun 3, 2004, at 09:15 US/Pacific, Andy Stalick wrote: > Hello All- > > I'm shopping around for an 86+ Westfalia, and one of the big question > marks in my head has to do with the transmission. I had a '76 > bay-window > camper a number of years ago with a manual transmission, and it was a > great vehicle, but driving the manual in traffic got really tiresome. > The > clutch pedel was pretty much vertical, forcing me to lift my entire leg > from the hip to operate it. Now, I am pretty tall, so perhaps more > average > height drivers wouldn't have this configuration. I haven't driven a > manual > vanagon, so I don't know how the pedals fit me. > > Another concern is the reliability of the automatic transmission. How > well > have these things held up? Are they markedly different from the > manuals? > > I don't expect to drive the vanagon like a racecar, so the lower > shift-points of the automatic don't bother me that much. Driving > moderately around town and on the highway, how do the two transmissions > compare? Both mated to the 2.1 wasserboxer. > > Comments? > > (Also, if anyone has a sweet deal on a well-kept Westy, near Austin, > TX, > let's talk!) >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »