

| Subject: | Re: [Syncro] Re: Why are campers higher at the rear? |
| From: | Simon Reinhardt |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Jun 2004 17:23:18 -0600 |
Sure, the winch may be a factor (don't get me started on the way the P.O. mounted that!), but what about the other campers I've seen with a similar inclination? I'm sure the extra weight of the cabinets will compress everything, but I would expect a more even keel, especially since the fronts can't be substantially weaker/more compressible than the rears, given that the Vanagon's main cargo area is the middle. I've loaded that camper down heavily before- all in the middle- and the rear settled more than the front. "But Simon, the rears are stiffer than the fronts because of the engine's weight!"- No, stiffness and height are not necessarily entwined. Here, look at this: http://www.farrside.net/vanagon/windtests.jpg Notice the Westy is the only one with a tilt? -Simon On Jun 10, 2004, at 5:07 PM, cz1137 wrote: > Simon, > > Those measurements of yours seem to be what I would expect > considering that the camper cabinets and top are going to compress > the springs arcoss the board, and that winch you got mounted waaaay > out in front is going to compress the front springs even more. I > think you will find that both of those vans have the same springs, > it's just the extra parts on the camper that are changing it's > attitude. > > Cory
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »