

| Subject: | Re: R12 to R134a Air Conditioning Conversion |
| From: | Doug in Calif |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Jun 2004 19:00:59 -0700 |
Which amounts to more load on the engine for given amount of cooling. The condensers are also redesigned. ----- Original Message ----- From: Stan Wilder To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 6:56 PM Subject: Re: R12 to R134a Air Conditioning Conversion You may also notice that they simply spin the compressor faster when they use 134r. Stan Wilder ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Brodbeck" <gull@GULL.US> To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 7:16 PM Subject: Re: R12 to R134a Air Conditioning Conversion > On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 15:58:03 -0500, Stan Wilder wrote > > I never said r134a was as good as R12. > > I just contend that if you use the 134a you might overcome the lesser > > cooling capabilities by adding another condenser to the system. > > It worked for me. > > This was Volvo's approach. Their official R134a conversion kit for the 240 > included a bigger condensor. 240 model years that came from the factory with > R134a had the bigger condensor *and* an electric pusher fan to supplement the > engine-driven fan. > > My 240 was converted without changing the condensor and it doesn't cool well > at all. I have it on good authority that a properly converted 240 will > "freeze your nipples off." > > > David Brodbeck, N8SRE > '86 Volvo 240DL wagon > '82 VW Vanagon Westfalia Diesel (ebay #2481476461)
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »